- The Startup Breakdown
- Posts
- Spaceium: Revolutionizing In-Space Fuel Infrastructure for the New Space Economy
Spaceium: Revolutionizing In-Space Fuel Infrastructure for the New Space Economy
Pioneering Advanced Fueling Systems and Robotic Technologies for Spacecraft
This is The Startup Breakdown, the only newsletter looking into the new Y Combinator companies that you need to know. By joining this growing community of hundreds of founders, investors, and other startup aficionados (think i spelled that right?), you're getting a firsthand look at the companies that may be the next Airbnb, Coinbase, or Reddit.
If you'd like to receive these newsletters directly in your inbox once a week, hit subscribe and never miss an email!
Premium subscribers include investors and YC-backed founders looking to stay ahead of the latest startup news.
|
Transforming In-Space Fuel Infrastructure: Spaceium's Groundbreaking Approach
THE PROBLEM
You’ve finally accepted that New York isn’t anywhere close to San Francisco, so you decide to pack up and make the trip.
Unfortunately, you won’t have much room, and your MPG will be Kevin Hart low (just watched the roast of tom brady) because you have to carry dozens of gas canisters or fully charged batteries because there are no fuel stations along the way. Whatever you take with you is what you’ll have to use to power your entire trip.
That’s the problem pointed out by Spaceium about the current spacecraft industry, emphasizing the need for advanced in-space fuel infrastructure.
Vehicles launch from Earth, weighed down by the fuel they must carry from the start. I can only imagine considering I can’t even stand up from the couch after Thanksgiving dinner.
This isn’t ideal for even low-stakes expeditions, much less the interplanetary travel that billionaires with too much time and money are hoping to make on a regular basis.
THE SOLUTION
The company is building the first in-space fuel systems, organizing the necessary infrastructure to pave the way for the next era of the space economy.
The company is building the first in-space fuel systems, organizing the necessary infrastructure to pave the way for the next era of the space economy.
The team’s in-space fuel infrastructure can store various kinds of fuel with no loss, even those with drastically different storage temperature requirements, and their proprietary robotic “arm” is able to accommodate any vehicle design.
This efficiency enables lighter takeoff weight, requiring less power or enabling greater takeoff payload and extended travel capabilities. In totality, this advanced in-space fuel infrastructure saves up to 40% on operating costs.
THE NUMBERS
Traction:
Potential customers include
launch vehicles
moon landers
spacecraft
Partnership with Aphelia
Aiming for first in-space prototype by 2025 (which, amazingly, is just next year…)
Market Size:
TAM: $80 billion, $1.1 trillion
SAM: $40 billion
SOM: $400 million
Competition:
Orbit Fab
Impulse Space
Space Force, Air Force
Team:
Ashi Dissanayake, CEO: built aerodynamic models for NASA, and leader in University of Ottawa’s rocket propulsion team where she studied aerospace engineering
Reza Fetanat, CTO: led UoO’s rocket program at university where he launched 3 rockets, fully developed 4 engines, and built a propulsion stability model
Risks:
In-house development: NASA has historically been keen on contracting out most non-research and launch functions, but some of the newer space companies that will be mainstays in the new space economy, namely SpaceX, have adopted policies of building every stage in the supply chain and avoiding any outsourcing
Regulatory concerns: Space is one of the most regulation-heavy industries in tech, and overcoming filing after filing and decision after decision will slow progress, and given the nationalization of the space economy in years past, it wouldn’t be surprising to see government discouragement of doing business with non-American agencies
Technical challenges: Deep tech is hard. We have some of the worlds smartest scientists working day and night on building engines and improving materials, and yet we’ve still never been to Mars
What I like:
Picks and shovels: Becoming a critical part of the infrastructure of a burgeoning industry creates a nearly insurmountable moat and decreases company-specific risks as they have a larger customer pool
Advisory team: The names they’ve been able to get on board to advise the founders are tremendous, providing expertise in everything from engineering to government relations
Partnership track record: They’ve already signed various partnerships with complementary space services, seemingly setting the stage for a successful run of larger and more critical partnerships in future years
Opportunities:
Branch into other services: The company is already targeting fueling and in-space repairs, but there are ample opportunities to expand their in-space fuel infrastructure to provide specialized services beyond this core offering, potentially in asteroid mining
Help satellites: Satellites offer the most immediate market, and though they’ve already done a bit of initial research into playing the low-earth orbit game, further building services that can assist these machines will be a good way to build cash flow and traction as it waits for the rest of the industry to mature
Further partnerships: Though they’ve had success in forming partnerships already, space seems to be a partnership-driven game, and they can continue to build their network of suppliers and potential customers by leveraging the YC network of former space companies, like Relativity, Astranis, or Epsilon3
Links of the week:
Biiiiig week of news. Had to cut myself short or I could have gone to at least a dozen. Nonetheless, here are the 5 links and resources that you need to see:
Share this newsletter with one friend to get access to the Links of the Week section in every newsletter, including today’s! 👇️
The NFL has hired PJT Partners to help them explore private equity opportunities, proving not even the pinnacle of American culture is free of the influence of finance.
They claim that the move will provide owners with an additional source of capital for projects like stadium renovations
The NFL has been one of the longest holdouts from allowing institutional money in team ownership
The move seemed inevitable, and given the rapid growth and profit of the sport, I expect the landscape to quickly come to resemble European soccer
OpenAI announced that is temporarily pausing the use of one of its ChatGPT voices, Sky, after accusations that the voice is designed to sound like Scarlett Johansson.
Specifically, users felt that the voice in the recent OpenAI demo day sounded like her artificial character in the movie Her, and separately, some are complaining about the character seeming overly sexual and flirtatious…
Making matters worse, Altman even quote tweeted the original demo video with the comment “her”
OpenAI denies the claims, instead saying it was a different voice actor, but they better be collecting their receipts because Johansson isn’t shy about voicing her displeasure with AI ripping off her status, suing an AI image generator last year in response to them using her likeness in an AI promo…
My take: this is just another in an ongoing debate on the IP classification of AI systems in the eyes of the law. Also, OpenAI knew exactly what they were doing - 8 of the top 30 most popular AI apps are dating simulators lmao
Side note, one of my most embarrassing facts is that I have yet to see the movie…
OpenAI has also been criticized publicly for its equity terms, most notably a clause that states that the non-profit can take claw back any equity from former employees who publicly speak poorly about the organization… that may be changing?
in regards to recent stuff about how openai handles equity:
we have never clawed back anyone's vested equity, nor will we do that if people do not sign a separation agreement (or don't agree to a non-disparagement agreement). vested equity is vested equity, full stop.
there was… x.com/i/web/status/1…
— Sam Altman (@sama)
9:00 PM • May 18, 2024
Biiiiig win for the YIMBY crowd as the Austin City Council voted in favor of HOME (Housing for Mobility and Equity) Phase 2, dramatically lowering the minimum lot size for building homes.
Now, just 1,800 square feet are needed versus the previous 5,750 lot size
Austin’s zoning rules, like many around the country, were created nearly a century ago in a society where people were making babies like crazy to celebrate the end of the war, and they make no sense now that world leaders are concerned with declining population due to people avoiding babies for financial reasons…
Ideally, this inspires other cities to make some serious changes as regulatory hurdles have caused just as much harm as inflation and purchasing power stagnation (and even decline)
A little motivation to keep you going. If you’re in the space right now, you probably need it
I’ll tell you a story I haven’t told many people (and it’s packed with lessons for every entrepreneur, creator)
I'm 18, bank account dwindling, and desperate for a job.
I applied to 100 jobs and got zero job offers.
They said I didn’t have enough experience or my French wasn’t… x.com/i/web/status/1…
— GREG ISENBERG (@gregisenberg)
2:58 PM • May 19, 2024
I know you guys are always looking for even more AI startup alpha, so here’s a cool thread I found with another dose:
$1B+ raised last week by AI startups
9 startups building insane products you should know about:
— Chief AI Officer (@chiefaioffice)
6:16 PM • May 19, 2024
Last word 👋
How am I doing?
I love hearing from readers, and I’m always looking for feedback. How am I doing with The Startup Breakdown? Is there anything you’d like to see more or less of? Which aspects of the newsletter do you like most?
How disappointed would you be if you could no longer read this newsletter? |
Cheers to another day,
Reply